top of page

Below are three articles, written and edited by me, for websites that no longer exist.

Parent/Child Relationships in Lady Bird & Autumn Sonata.

A comparative essay on the dynamics between mother and daughter, in the films by Ingmar Bergman and Greta Gerwig.

The dynamic within a parent/child relationship is probably the most complex relationship known to us. Bringing a child into the world, and in turn, being that child, there comes feelings of empowerment, loyalty, trust, and adoration, among other prideful sentiments. Sadly, however, there is just as much room, if not more, for manipulation, ego and neglect to exist as well. Being a parent can mean being a protector, a best friend, a caregiver. Being a child can mean being a burden, ungrateful, a drain to resources, etc. This relationship, more often than not, cannot exist without the idea of someone knowing best, becoming a point of conflict. There will always be a desperate want to have control over the other’s outlook. Whether it be a child, wanting to break free from the shackles of being under a parent’s control, or a parent, feeling that they have the better judgement, and knowing what’s best. Perhaps this is a negative view of such a sentimental relationship. While I don’t feel the parent/child relationship is inherently harmful, the possibility for these relationships to break out into these battles is never too far from reach.

There are two films that, I feel, deal with these ideas so intricately, yet ferociously, within their final few minutes. Those being Autumn Sonata, directed by Ingmar Bergman, and Lady Bird, directed by Greta Gerwig. Heavy spoilers to follow.

Autumn Sonata absolutely broke me, showcasing one of the rawest depictions of a parent/child relationship ever seen on screen. Charlotte (Ingrid Bergman), a classical pianist, stays with her daughter, Eva (Liv Ullmann), with whom she shares a very damaged relationship. Charlotte has a long history of neglecting her daughter, for fame and life on the road, igniting feelings in Eva that she has had bottled up for her entire life. Over one long night, Eva finally opens up to her mother about the feelings she’s been harbouring for so long, leading to a complete deconstruction of the parent/child dynamic, in search of a future for them both.

While the film starts out quite cute and tender, it slowly unravels itself, causing it to nearly break under its own weight. With the knowledge of the rest of the film, the first half hour is consistently stretching out the tension between the two characters, who are both showing constant restraint, until cracks in their demeanor start to show. What I find fascinating (and possibly slightly traumatic) is the lack of understanding from Charlotte. No matter how much is spelled out to her, no matter how undeniable her neglect was, she will always bring her work back into the conversation, often knowing exactly what piece of music she was playing on any given night, and using that to remind herself of what promise she broke at that time, showing the prioritisation of her work over her children.

There is so much to pull out of their conversation, but what hit me the most is the ending, in which after everything, Charlotte still leaves first chance she gets, not showing any remorse or even accountability. Yet in her absence, two heart-breaking things happen: Firstly, Charlotte is near breakdown on the train, trying to get her manager to distract her with constant praise and chatter, so she doesn't have to dwell on what's obviously affected her. This is ridiculously upsetting, showing that she feels so much guilt and is so afraid of coming to terms with her own shortcomings as a mother, yet she didn't let her daughter see any of it, still pushing the agenda that she's done nothing wrong; Secondly, Eva, after finally releasing to her mother, all of the trauma she's had to deal with, and will forever have hanging over her, nothing has changed. She feels no release, as there was never fault admitted, and her feelings weren't validated. However, instead of seeing this as a reason to distance herself from her mother, she sees it that she has again, pushed her mother away.

The ending is made to seem hopeful, in that they may makeup someday, but it's so much more tragic. Eva has reverted back to how she was in the beginning, completely submissive and under the thumb of her mother. Instead of seeing her mother as a hopeless cause, she says she will fight for a chance to see her again before she dies and to make things right. It's genius to end the film with similar dialogue to the opening, as the film is a complete circle: We see her pining and worrying over reconnecting with her mother; Charlotte arrives; tension rises to a point of explosion; Eva finally says everything she wants to say, hoping for Charlotte to admit fault and validate her feelings; Charlotte leaves, once again neglecting her daughter; Finally, we see Eva pining and worrying over reconnecting with her mother again, just as we started.

Eva might as well still be a child, anxiously waiting for her mother to return for a few days, even though she knows it will only lead to disappointment and anger. I often dislike movies that have the message of "always forgive family" or "you only have one family". Sometimes family can be the most damaging people in someone's life, and the idea of always forgiving and always trying to see past things just to have a typical 'loving family' is a horrific moral obligation to push on anyone.

Lady Bird, however, explores the parent/child dynamic differently. While there’s still feelings of control, tensions reaching a boiling point, and a large distance between the two at its climax, Lady Bird feels much more hopeful, than the devastating ending to Autumn Sonata.

Lady Bird
tells the story of Christine (Saoirse Ronan), or, as she prefers, ‘Lady Bird’, finding herself in her final year of high school, and trying to map out the rest of her life. She is also in constant conflict with her mother, Marion (Laurie Metcalf), who is trying to keep Lady Bird’s aspirations realistic, due to her many fears, including the idea of losing her daughter, as well as the family’s financial situation. Most of the conflict between the two comes from Lady Bird wanting to make her own decisions, wanting to “live through something”, wanting to make mistakes and find herself away from her hometown, etc. While her mother is afraid of losing respect from her, as she tries to maintain an air of knowing what’s best for her.

One line that really stands out at the end of the film, comes from Lady Bird’s Dad, after secretly sending Lady Bird the discarded letters Marion was trying to write to her daughter. He explains that Marion was self conscious of her writing, and was scared of Lady Bird critiquing it. She spends so much of the movie trying to get Lady Bird to want to reach her full potential, to weigh up her options and become the best version of herself she can be. Through this, she often puts down Lady Bird's abilities, trying to seem like a role model for her daughter, who has everything together and knows best. In this moment though, she shows her vulnerability, but also her confidence in Lady Bird to know better than her. She's scared Lady Bird will see her mother's flaws and possibly even lose respect for her. It's not so much that she wants to have control over her daughter, but be her guide and a sense of wisdom. She's realising she can no longer provide that, and is scared of the dynamic being flipped around.

They're both such stubborn characters, that obviously have so much respect for each other, yet it kills them to show it. The final moment of the film sees Lady Bird leaving a heartfelt message for her mother on the family answering machine. I often think that Marion was there, listening to her daughter's message while she was leaving it, and was about to answer just as Lady Bird hung up the phone. Almost acting as a bookend to the start of the film, where, while both in tears, they glance at one another. However, they just miss each other's eyes by only a second. They constantly want to share a glance, that certain glance to let each other know how much they care. However, they always seem to just miss one another.

The endings of these two films pose interesting viewpoints on the parent/child dynamic, specifically, the relationship between mother and daughter. Autumn Sonata offers a conclusion of devastation, and repeating cycles of a child, conditioned to forever submit to the hope of her mother’s love, no matter how much neglect the mother offers. Lady Bird, while having a very different dilemma within its climax, has a similar idea, in creating a distance between the characters. A distance for them to come to terms with their feelings on one another.

Autumn Sonata has the mother in turmoil, no matter how hard she will try to deny it, and the daughter in denial about the future of their relationship. Lady Bird ends with the mother in a state of possible regret, trying to mend their relationship, but feeling powerless to do so, and the daughter still craving her mothers love and support, however, on new terms. While both films end with the daughter pining for a relationship with their mother, Autumn Sonata gives us no hope of a functional love between them, even hinting at the idea that they may never see each other again. Lady Bird, however, is left open-ended. Through Marion’s discarded letters and Lady Bird’s voicemail, we see that they both have gained the ability to view their relationship in a new light, they just have to finally share that glance.

Act Da Fool - A Decade Later

A look back at the 2010 short film by Harmony Korine.

In 2010, (in)famous filmmaker, Harmony Korine, made a short film for women’s clothing company, Proenza Schouler, Act Da Fool. It’s been a decade since the release of this short, made at a time when Korine had only recently returned to filmmaking, after a long period of self destruction. Inciting this slightly left-field collaboration, was the two founders of Proenza Schouler, Jack McCollough and Lazaro Hernandez. Korine was their first choice, after being lifelong fans of the 1995 movie, Kids, in which Korine wrote the screenplay.

 

Looking back on this short now, its themes and messages still hold a ridiculous amount of weight, with regards to race and class struggle, the loss of childhood and innocence, etc. Harmony has always had an ability to identify and empathise with the oddballs, the outcasts, the people that are usually forgotten about. This empathy is at the forefront of his debut masterpiece, Gummo, in which the civilians of a hurricane-stricken town, stuck in their strange and self-destructive ways, are made feel so human, these characters are treated with a level of care and respect that no other filmmaker would give them. This shows up in spades in Act Da Fool, which is very much a return to the style of dream-like, first-person narratives, placing the viewer right in the middle of these characters lives.

 

The short showcases the lives of a young group of girls, featuring a monologue from one of them, talking about their dead-end town, and how they cope with their situation. Her words are fuelled with the futility of hope or escape. She talks of calling her dad Saint Nick, as he’s overweight and wears a red Santa hat, however, this could go deeper, as visually he’s seen holding a bag of bread. She sees her father as this positive force of gift-giving and selflessness, for being a provider, equating Christmas gifts with getting basic amenities.

 

She also talks of the futility of life, naturally coming from her environment, in that life isn’t worth living and “everyone’s gonna die sooner or later.” When she says that people who live in her town are nameless, and that “everyone’s just passing through”, she could be referencing a dwindling community, or possibly a large death rate, as if people “passing through” sums up their life, spent entirely in this dead-end town. People are born, live, and die, leaving little-to-no mark on their surroundings in this place. However, she wants something more for herself.

 

She touches on the loss of childhood innocence within her friends, saying they can do some ”messed-up shit”, yet they can still act like “little babies.” Their surroundings have given them a need to be tough, and to grow up quick, yet they can’t help but give into their more childlike tendencies, even though this is looked at negatively, reducing these desires and instincts to nothing more than childish behaviour.

 

However, the girls find their escape in the stars, as they see religion as having failed them. She references God speaking to her, telling her that her “stupid ass” would be kicked “up and down” the street.

 

“How come God gotta be so violent?”

 

This could reference the lack of support or help from prayer, or faith. God is said to combat their destructive nature, with violence, which isn’t too far from the idea of Hell and Eternal Damnation. She’s sick of being told that living the way she does will lead her to a life of pain. Maybe this behaviour is necessary in a place like this? Maybe it’s to cope from the struggle of everyday life.

 

The stars are the only thing keeping the girls’ heads looking up towards a greater future, towards escape. The stars can’t leave them, without fail, they appear to them every night. As long as they are good to one another, they can get out of this town, they can be happy.

 

“I trust the stars, the stars ain’t never lied yet.”

 

The message and ideas being pushed by the short, are in stark contrast with the clothes the girls are wearing, coming entirely from the high-end fashion brand who’s name is attached to the film. While the owners of Proenza Schouler have said that the film shows the clothes in a positive light, and that the film overall has a positive outlook, I can’t help but feel some sly satire from Korine. Hearing these girls talk of being in a decaying town, where death doesn’t mean much and seeing the overgrown, trash-filled, impoverished area they’re living in, it’s hard not to see the expensive clothes they’re wearing as a strict juxtaposition between what the upper-class are blowing money on, versus what the lower-class are living through. A quick glance at the Proenza Schouler website shows an extortionate price point on the majority of their products. Was Korine being funded by this company while simultaneously using that money to parody the ethics of said company? Or are the clothes more of an aspiration for these girls? A goal they could one day reach, of being able to dress this way. Or even, are the clothes a metaphor for their mindset of being above their community? Do they see themselves as of a higher standard than those around them?

 

Yet again, Harmony will always leave his viewers with more questions than answers, but there’s a beauty in that. The worlds he creates will forever linger in my mind, and having these unanswered questions surround these worlds, only make them all the more magical.

 

You can watch the short here.

Meeting of the Waters

A review of the 2017 album by Animal Collective.

On Animal Collective’s latest outing, Avey Tare and Geologist (a first without Panda Bear) delve deep into the ambiance of the Amazon Rainforest to record a small collection of ethereal folk tunes, showing a welcomed return to their more experimental sounds.

​

Starting with the 13-minute opener, ‘Blue Noses’, the sounds of watery electronics and airy atmosphere slowly fill the mix, seguing into a gorgeous collage of lightly strummed acoustic guitar and Avey’s breathy vocals. Singing of pure adoration, the lines “we’ll always love you, pure jolly, they’ll never taste our blue noses” perfectly complement the spacious instrumental. Locking into a hypnotizing groove of repeating chords and vocal melodies, we are eventually left back where we started in the engulfing ambiance of nature. As with most of this EP, the main feeling I get with this song is fragility, which is more than likely mirroring the frailty of the Rainforest itself, given that the proceeds for this release are to benefit Idesam (Instituto de Conservação e Desenvolvimento Sustentável do Amazonas), a non-profit NGO that works towards the conservation and sustainable development of the Amazon region.

​

Transitioning then into ‘Man of Oil’, we are given a much more conventional structure, however the field recordings and ambiance still have a large presence in the mix, this time featuring women talking and running water. Avey’s vocal sounds almost nervous and uncertain, with his “ooo” melodies feeling very shaky, mirroring the sadly reminiscent lyrics, “I find it so hard to tell you, I’m afraid to forget the smell of you.” The different electronic effects, drenched in reverb elevate this track far beyond a simple folk tune, with some sounds emulating animal noises, and others sounding increasingly haunting, such as the outro of the track.

 

The third song, ‘Amazonawana / Anaconda Opportunity’, is a track filled with electronics, field recordings and distorted vocal samples. The extremely quiet guitar and warped vocal chants near the opening make for one of the oddest passages on the album. The song goes through a couple different reinventions, with the last couple minutes seguing into the final track, ‘Selection of a Place (Rio Negro Version)’. 

​

Two songs that really stand out for me on this EP is the opener and the closer. Two long, ethereal sound collages, with slow vocal melodies and a ton of gorgeous effects. The beautiful, spacious aura crawls along this song, giving us only tastes of what Avey and Geologist must have experienced during their time in the Rainforest. This song sums up the entire feeling that this album gives the listener. and that’s an invitation into this gorgeous, sadly shrinking, paradise in nature, where endless amounts of wildlife are living their lives. If the band were trying to make a case for the preservation of the Amazon on this EP, I think they did a marvelous job. It’s hard to listen to this effort and not feel like your floating, as even through the sounds of the Rainforest alone, the importance and beauty of its survival shines through.

bottom of page